top of page

Frequently Asked Questions 

  • 1. What is the Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Grant Program?
    The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) established the new Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) discretionary program, with $5 billion in appropriated funds over 5 years, 2022-2026. The SS4A program funds regional, local, and Tribal initiatives through grants to prevent roadway deaths and serious injuries. The following groups of applicants are eligible for the SS4A grant program: Counties, cities, towns, transit agencies, and other special districts that are political subdivisions of a State. Metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs). Federally recognized Tribal governments. The program supports the development of a comprehensive safety action plan (Action Plan) that identifies the most significant roadway safety concerns in a community and the implementation of projects and strategies to address roadway safety issues. Action Plans are the foundation of the SS4A grant program. SS4A requires an eligible Action Plan be in place before applying to implement projects and strategies. The SS4A program provides funding for two types of grants: Planning and Demonstration Grants provide Federal funds to develop, complete, or supplement a comprehensive safety action plan. The goal of an Action Plan is to develop a holistic, well-defined strategy to prevent roadway fatalities and serious injuries in a locality, Tribe, or region. Planning and Demonstration Grants also fund supplemental planning and/or demonstration activities that inform the development of a new or existing Action Plan. The Department encourages including demonstration activities in an application. Implementation Grants provide Federal funds to implement projects and strategies identified in an Action Plan to address a roadway safety problem. Projects and strategies can be infrastructure, behavioral, and/or operational activities. Implementation Grants may also include demonstration activities, supplemental planning, and project-level planning, design, and development. Applicants must have an eligible Action Plan to apply for Implementation Grants. The Department encourages including demonstration activities in an application.
  • 2. Where can I learn more about the SS4A Grant Program?
    Information related to the SS4A Grant Program can be found on U.S. Department of Transportation website. https://www.transportation.gov/grants/SS4 A Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) is released each year of the grant program. The Notice of Funding Opportunity solicits applications for Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) grants. The 2023 NOFO can be reviewed online (https://www.transportation.gov/grants/ss4a/fy23-nofo).
  • 3. What are the requirements of an Action Plan to be eligible for SS4A Implementation Grant?
    Please refer to the SS4A Self-Certification Eligibility Worksheet located: https://www.transportation.gov/grants/ss4a/self-certification-worksheet. The WFRC CSAP will be the compliant Action Plan. It will be up to each city/ applicant to reference this WFRC Plan.
  • 4. What will make an Implementation Grant application more competitive?
    The SS4A Grant Program has the following priorities: Promote safety to prevent death and serious injuries on public roadways; Employ low-cost, high-impact strategies that can improve safety over a wide geographic area; Ensure equitable investment in the safety needs of underserved communities, which includes both underserved urban and rural communities; Incorporate evidence-based projects and strategies and adopt innovative technologies and strategies; Demonstrate engagement with a variety of public and private stakeholders; and Align with the Department’s mission and Strategic Goals such as safety; climate change and sustainability; equity and Justice40; and workforce development, job quality, and wealth creation.
  • 5. Can some of the grant funds be used for public service announcements and other driver education communication efforts? Educational video?
    Yes, depending on recommendations of the adopted Action Plan. Please see the response to Question 4. Please also refer to the FHWA website: https://www.transportation.gov/grants/ss4a/eligible-implementation-grant-projects
  • 6. What roadways will be eligible for implementation funds?
    All roadways are eligible for implementation funds if an eligible applicant meets the following requirement specific for an Implementation Grant: Must be an eligible applicant with an eligible Action Plan in place based on the Self-Certification Eligibility Worksheet AND have at least one of the following: Ownership and/or maintenance responsibilities over a roadway network. Safety responsibilities that affect roadways. An agreement from the agency that has ownership and/or maintenance responsibilities for the roadway within the applicant’s jurisdiction. State highways, for example, require support and cooperation from UDOT.
  • 7. What Zero Fatalities leadership commitment is needed from the various agencies?
    One of the elements of an Action Plan is leadership commitment to an eventual goal of zero fatalities and serious injuries. The following description is provided in the NOFO of this component of an Action Plan: An official public commitment (e.g., resolution, policy, ordinance) by a high-ranking official and/or governing body (e.g., Mayor, City Council, Tribal Council, metropolitan planning organization [MPO], Policy Board) to an eventual goal of zero roadway fatalities and serious injuries. The commitment must include a goal and timeline for eliminating roadway fatalities and serious injuries achieved through one, or both, of the following: the target date for achieving zero roadway fatalities and serious injuries, OR an ambitious percentage reduction of roadway fatalities and serious injuries by a specific date with an eventual goal of eliminating roadway fatalities and serious injuries. WFRC intends to establish a leadership commitment as a part of the project.
  • 8. In general, how much SS4A funding is available?
    The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law established the SS4A program and approved $6 billion in funding, with $5 billion in advanced appropriations. For fiscal year 2023, $1 billion has been made available for grants under the SS4A program, plus approximately an additional $177 million for funding Planning and Demonstration grants, or supplemental planning and demonstration activities in Implementation Grant requests, that was unallocated from FY 2022. There is no statutory minimum or maximum. However, the NOFO provides expected minimum and maximum ranges for each applicant type and DOT may award less than the total amount requested by the applicant. When considering the appropriate funding request, DOT recommends an applicant consider the level of effort to administer a Federal grant and the associated administrative requirements when developing the budget. For Planning and Demonstration Grants, award amounts will be based on estimated costs, with an expected minimum of $100,000 and an expected maximum of $10,000,000. The Department expects larger award amounts for metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs), applicants that are multijurisdictional in scope, or those conducting activities in a large geographic area. For Implementation Grants, DOT expects the minimum award will be $2,500,000 and the maximum award will be $25,000,000. A local match of no less than 20 percent of the total project cost is required for all SS4A grant funds. Local match may include both cash as well as in-kind contributions. Please refer to the FHWA Safe Streets and Roads for All website for current information: https://www.transportation.gov/grants/SS4A.
  • 9. Will WFRC help with applying for grants or is all that left to municipal efforts?
    WFRC will complete an Action Plan that will satisfy requirements for agencies and municipalities within WFRC to apply for an Implementation Grant. Implementation Grant applications will be the responsibility of the local agency or municipality, although WFRC may provide general guidelines or suggestions.
  • 10. If the identified safety improvement project is located at the intersection of a state and local road is that location eligible for funding under SS4A Grant Program?
    SS4A funds are directed to improving streets owned, operated, and maintained by local jurisdictions. An eligible applicant must have an agreement with the agency that has ownership and/or maintenance responsibilities for the roadway within the applicant’s jurisdiction to implement the project or strategy as part of an Implementation Grant.
  • 11. Would development of urban design standards be an eligible activity?
    Policy and process updates, with a safety focus or benefit, are an eligible activity of a comprehensive safety action plan. The WFRC CSAP will include a policy review and may identify recommendations for new policies/design guidelines. However, those will not be prepared within the WFRC CSAP. A local jurisdiction could apply for a supplemental grant to prepare the standards/policy, if the need is identified in the comprehensive safety action plan.
  • 12. Where could I find successful SS4A Implementation Fund applications?
    The SS4A 2022 Grant Awards can be found online (https://www.transportation.gov/grants/ss4a/2022-awards). Examples of joint applications can be found online.
  • 13. I am interested to know how many municipalities in the region are able to directly receive federal funds through this competitive program? Currently most federal funds flow through UDOT. UDOT is not eligible for this funding source, but the municipalities might not be ready to administer federal funds?
    Please refer to the FHWA Safe Streets and Roads for All website: https://www.transportation.gov/grants/SS4A. SS4A award funds will go directly to the applicant of the grant. The FHWA Utah Division office is available to answer questions regarding the administration of federal funds. It is our understanding that the FHWA Utah Division office would administer federal funds for agencies not able to provide their own administration. Please consult with the FHWA Utah Division office to confirm. With the current minimum award amount for an implementation grant identified in the response to question # 8, it may make sense for a municipality to submit a joint application with another municipality or agency.
  • 14. Could the SS4A program funding be used to improve safety at locations where trains are crossing local streets? Potentially a joint application with the Utah Transit Authority?
    Transit agencies are an eligible applicant, including transit authorities operated by political subdivisions of a State. See also # 15.
  • 15. Could you give an example of a joint application?
    A joint application would be one submitted by two partnering communities or agencies. One of the agencies would be designated as a lead agency. The other agency would be designated as a supporting agency. FHWA looks favorably upon joint applications.
  • 16. Will a standing committee be set up to add/remove projects to the CSAP, or to otherwise amend it? Or could that be done through the TAC and TransCom groups? I see a need for this to be a living document to adjust over the life of the SS4A funding period.
    It is not the intent of WFRC to amend or update the Action Plan within the duration of the Safe Streets and Roads for All program. The CSAP will recommend how CSAP implementation will be monitored, and performance reported following its completion. Options could be through the TAC or TransCom, the Safety Steering Team established for the CSAP, or similar. The CSAP will be a resource for local governments to use to support implementation of the recommended safety strategies in their community consistent with safety needs defined in the CSAP. For example, the Action Plan could identify the benefits of systemically constructing roundabouts to improve safety within an area. The local government will have the flexibility to prioritize projects and locations.
  • 17. Will there be a public comment period?
    Documents related to the CSAP will be posted on the project website (www.wfrcsafetyplan.org) for public review and comment from now until CSAP completion in July 2024. A comment page is provided on the project website.
  • 18. Will WFRC send staff to city council meetings to lead discussions on how councils can best work with their own Public Works to customize the Regional Action Plan for their own city’s determination/prioritization for planning and demonstration grants AND/OR Implementation grants?
    We encourage representatives of local jurisdictions to participate in Geographic Focus Area meetings that will be held in October 2023 and February 2024. This will be the best opportunity to provide community-specific input.
  • 19. What area(s) and roadways will the CSAP cover?
    The CSAP is inclusive of the Wasatch Front Regional Council planning area, which includes Salt lake County, Davis County, Weber County, Morgan County, Tooele County, and the southern portion of Box Elder County (Brigham City). The CSAP will focus on non-UDOT maintained roadways.
  • 20. Will this effort coordinate with UDOT’s Vulnerable Road User (VRU) Safety Assessment?
    Yes, WFRC is participating in this effort. VRU findings will be incorporated into the Action Plan as much as possible.
  • 21. Who should be attending the GFA meetings?
    GFA meetings are where representatives from individual communities can review safety analysis findings and provide input to recommendations related to their specific area. GFA meeting invitations will be sent to representatives of each WFRC jurisdiction. It will be up to the jurisdiction to confirm their representative (jurisdictions can send more than one representative). We are particularly interested in attendance and participation from those with the following responsibilities: Transportation Planning Traffic Engineering Traffic Enforcement Emergency Services Traffic safety education and outreach
  • 22. Is speed and target speed being considered as part of the CSAP?
    FHWA has identified several “Proven Safety Countermeasures” (PSCs). FHWA encourages agencies to consider and implement the PSCs. CSAP will consider, based on safety needs, which PSCs are appropriate for implementation in the Wasatch Front Regional Council planning area. The PSCs are described here: https://highways.dot.gov/safety/proven-safety-countermeasures. Speed Management and appropriate speed limits for all road users is one of the PSCs.
  • 23. Will definite treatments of traffic calming be addressed?
    We are at the beginning stages of the analysis, and have not yet identified safety needs and potential strategies. In general, we anticipate that countermeasures will be selected from nationally-recognized resources including the FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures (https://highways.dot.gov/safety/proven-safety-countermeasures) or Countermeasures that Work (https://www.nhtsa.gov/book/countermeasures/countermeasures-work)
  • 24. Are Strava reports being used?
    Strava data is not incorporated into the CSAP analysis scope of work. Strava subscribers tend to be competitive cyclists rather than the typical bicycle commuter or casual cyclist, so the data provides limited information about overall bicycle users. The soon to be completed UDOT study about Vulnerable Road Users is an in depth analysis of bicycling and other non-motorized transportation and those findings will be incorporated into the CSAP.
  • 25. Is the roadway type map interactive so that agencies/municipalities can see our eligible areas in detail?
    A UDOT online interactive map shows a breakdown of roadways by state routes, local federal aid routes, and local routes. The following website can aid in identifying roadway classifications: https://maps.udot.utah.gov/uplan_data/documents/HRO/
  • 26. What will the safety analysis focus on?
    The WFRC CSAP safety analysis focuses on the following, as summarized in the Self-Certification Checklist: Analysis of existing conditions and historical trends to baseline the level of crashes involving fatalities and serious injuries across a jurisdiction, locality, Tribe, or region; Analysis of the location where there are crashes, the severity, as well as contributing factors and crash types; Analysis of systemic and specific safety needs is also performed, as needed (e.g., high risk road features, specific safety needs of relevant road users; and, A geospatial identification (geographic or locational data using maps) of higher risk locations.
  • 27. Does UDOT or WFRC have bicycle and pedestrian crash information on state and local roads?
    Yes, the UDOT crash database shows the location of known bicycle and pedestrian crashes occurring on roadways and includes the roadway ownership as part of the database.
  • 28. Is there a breakdown of fatalities for each city within those counties? Will the crash data analysis be by individual jurisdiction?
    Crash analysis will be presented at the Geographic Focus Area( GFAs) level, which consists of approximately 6 cities or less, and not individual jurisdictions or cities. GFA analysis will be sufficiently detailed to identify potential project locations for a particular jurisdiction or city.
  • 29. How is speed being considered in the CSAP?
    The CSAP may recommend safety improvements including those identified by FHWA as Proven Safety Countermeasures. Speed Management is one of the FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures. Recommendations will also build on the Safe System Approach adopted as part of USDOT’s National Roadway Safety Strategy. The CSAP includes review of data such as “hard braking” on local streets that may inform identification of areas where speed may be of concern. Speed is also one of the risk factors being reviewed. The CSAP includes a task to review policies, which may be inclusive of speed-related policies.
  • 30. Can you illustrate the number of crashes by Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) by jurisdiction to put crashes in better context/scale/significance?
    The methodologies in the safety analysis consider functional classification of the roadway (Arterials, Collectors, Local Streets). The methodology identifies roadway segments and intersections that have a higher-than-expected crash rate considering traffic volume.
  • 31. Does this analysis capture data of operational speed, speed limits, and establish a Safe System Approach target speed that should guide all traffic calming efforts around the valley to align target speed vs. operating speed?
    Establishing a target speed for every roadway segment within the WFRC planning area is beyond the intended scope and outcome of the CSAP. The CSAP intends to include discussion of speed as a strategy or policy as recommendations are formulated.
  • 32. Is UDOT open to re-evaluating speed limits with State routes that are also Main Streets with downtowns.
    See response to Question #31. We also encourage you to discuss this question with the appropriate UDOT Region staff.
  • 33. Will this project incorporate concepts that are currently being advocated by Strong Towns? I worry about "over engineering" solutions that aim to improve public safety while de-valuing or removing physical elements that contribute to quality urban design, placemaking, walkability, etc.
    The CSAP intends to consider a broad range of solutions, including those consistent with the Safe System Approach, FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures (https://highways.dot.gov/safety/proven-safety-countermeasures), and other principles to reduce vehicle speed and potential conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians and bicycles. The CSAP will focus on the safety benefits of various strategies. Implementation and design details will be the responsibility of individual cities requesting funds for the project.
  • 34. Does the study seek to remove vehicle traffic lanes and replace them with “protected” bike lanes?
    Study recommendations will be performance-driven, based on a robust data analysis consistent with national best practices. The study seeks to improve safety for all roadway users, including vehicles, people walking, and people riding bicycles.
bottom of page